Personality, Group Thinking and Cohesiveness as Predictor of Criminal Behavior among Adolescents
South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics,
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of Group thinking, cohesiveness and Personality characteristics as predictors of Criminal Behaviour. The population comprises of Three Hundred (300) students through stratified sampling technique from institutions in Ekiti State was used. A questionnaire was designed using a descriptive research design for data collection. The data was collected using questionnaire. Three hypotheses were tested in total and they are: there will be a significant relationship between group thinking, cohesiveness, personality characteristics and criminal behavior; Personality Characteristics will significantly predict criminal behavior; Group thinking and cohesiveness will have main and interaction influence on criminal behaviour; the first hypothesis was tested using regression analysis and found that there is a positive and significant relationship between criminal behaviour and group thinking with r = .194, p<0.05 and there is a negative but significant relationship between personality characteristics and group cohesiveness with r = -.123, p<0.05. the second hypothesid was tested using linear regression analysis and found that that F (299) = .000, p > 0.05 significant level and the hypothesis rejected. The thirds hypothesis was tested using one way ANOVA analysis showed that group thinking has an influence on criminal behaviour among adolescents, F(299) = 5.768, p<0.05, group cohesiveness does not have a significant influence on criminal behaviour of adolescents, F(299) = 2.124, p>0.05. the results were discussed in line with relevant empirical literature, conclusion and recommendation. The study concluded that group thinking is a major predictor of criminal behaviour among adolescents, while group cohesiveness and personality characteristics do not influence criminal behaviour among adolescents. It was recommended that there is need of adequate sensitization of adolescents on the negative consequences criminal behavior and how it can affect their future if not curtailed, Government should organize empowerment for the youth, so that it can reduce criminal act and the government introduces or organize seminar to the adolescents, to teach them how to behave in the society.
- group thinking
- criminal behavior and adolescents
How to Cite
Estévez E, Inglés CJ, Martínez-Monteagudo MC. School aggression: Effects of classroom environment, attitude to authority and social reputation among peers. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2013;1:22-32.
Fedstingen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ; 2009.
George CH. Interaction effects in multiple regression, Sage, Newbury Park, CA; 2005.
Glueck S. Understanding Criminology–Current Theoretical Debates, 2nd edition, Maidenhead: Open University Press; 1950.
Holmen DG. Measures of criminal attitudes and associates.Unpublished User Guide; 2008.
Gottfdred LS, Hirschi SG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Sage, Newbury Park, CA; 2019.
Belknap GD. “Criminal Thinking and Recidivism: Meta-Analytic Evidence on the Predictive and Incremental Validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS)” Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2007;17(3):272-278.
Brek P. “A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!” Criminology. 2005;34: 575–607.
Conklin NN. “Endogenous factors of juvenile delinquency and the perspectives of its prognosing”, International Journal of Academic Research. 1995;1(2): 195-198.
Eccles JS, Roeser RW. Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2011;21(1):225- 241
Emile K. “Post-Release Employment and Recidivism Among Different Types of Offenders With A Different Level of Education: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study in Indiana”, Justice Policy Journal. 1897;9(1):2-29.
Lambert SF, Cashwell CS. Preteens talking to parents: Perceived communication and school-based aggression. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families. 2003;11:1-7.
LeBlanc L, Swisher R, Vitaro F, Tremblay RE. High school social climate and antisocial behavior: A 10 year longitudinal and multilevel study. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2008;18(3): 395-419.
Lösel F, Farrington DP. Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012; 43(2):8-23.
Wisdom JE. “Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students”, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1992;3:179- 189.
Zamble D, Quinay DP.“Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males”, EuropeanJournal of Criminology. 2017;6:496-516.
Zeidenr CE. “PEN, big five, juvenile delinquency and criminal recidivism”, Personality and Individual Differences, 2016;39(1):7–19.
Muller et.al. The Causes and Cures of Criminality, Plenum, New York; 2014.
Siegel BG. Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston; 2001.
Tzmer SB. Psychoticism as a dimension of personality, Crane, Russak and Co., New York; 2008.
Vanderbilt D, Augustyn M. The effects of bullying. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2010;20(7):315-320.
Vertommen. The legal regulation of adolescence (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley; 2000.
Bresnen SJ. “The recent past and near future of risk/need assessment”, Crime and Delinquency. 2007;52:7-27.
McElhinney P. “Development and Validation of a Measure of Criminal Social Identity within a sample of Polish Recidivistic Prisoners”, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health (in press); 2005.
Chapman K. “The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis” Psychological Bulletin. 2006;123:123- 142.
King RB. “Prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR (Statistical Information on Recidivism) Scale” Canadian Journal of Criminology, 1999l38:61–79.
Snook M, Connon E. Eysenck’s personality dimensions as predictors of male adolescent trajectories of physical aggression, theft and vandalism” Personality and Individual Differences. 2005l;41:1309-1320.
Griffith C. “Personality and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: An enquiry into Eysenck’s and Gray’s theories”. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2018;23:767–781.
Gottlieb R. 2The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the USA and Australia”, Personality and Individual Differences. 1991;13:443–449.
Abstract View: 87 times
PDF Download: 41 times