Understanding Social Accountability at Rural Local Governance in Bangladesh and the Way Forward: In the Case of Union Parishad
South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, Volume 17, Issue 4,
Page 36-45
DOI:
10.9734/sajsse/2023/v17i4644
Abstract
In the 21st Century social accountability has become one of the preconditions to create a more transparent and representative government and aid public institutions in meeting the expectations of the population through empowering citizens which is necessary for effective and sustainable development. Social accountability of the elected representatives at the rural level may help the government increase service quality, empower rural citizens, and promote good governance. At present Bangladesh, mostly known as the “Development Surprise”, has leaped towards lower middle-income country status from a poor developing one within four decades of its decisive victory. In this stage of growth and development, the persistence of social accountability at the rural local government would ensure the attainment of sustainable development through ensuring demand-based service delivery. Against this backdrop, this paper intends to explore the present status of social accountability mechanisms at the Union Parishad which is the lowest tier of rural local governance in Bangladesh. Based on the analysis, several recommendations for the way forward have been summarized. Secondary data analysis and empirical knowledge have been exerted which would refer to a clear view of the current status of social accountability at the grass root level. The first section mentions the importance of social accountability at the union level based on theoretical analysis. Existing mechanisms to ensure social accountability at Union Parishad have been delineated in the second section. The third section develops a compact understanding of the current status of social accountability at the Union Parishad level. The fourth section will share a discussion of the findings, recommendations, and conclusion. This study finds that the lack of interest among Union Parishad Functionaries, avoidance by citizens, irregularities in committee formation, irregular meetings, lack of resources, clientelism and Govt. supervision, etc. have made the social accountability mechanisms at the rural local government ineffective and fruitless. The political willingness of the Government, GO-NGO collaboration, allocation of resources to rural local government, awareness raising among citizens, educating citizens politically, and ensuring proper training for the officials in the Union Parishad can play an important role to revive social accountability through deliberative forums and committees in the rural local government.
- Social accountability
- sustainable development
- good governance
- demand-based service delivery
- rural local governance
- Shava
How to Cite
References
Fox JA. Social accountability: what does the evidence really say? World Dev. 2015;72:346-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011
Elias Sarker AE. The illusion of decentralization: evidence from Bangladesh. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2003;16(7):523-48. DOI: 10.1108/09513550310500391
Tonwe DA. Conceptualizing local government from a multidimensional perspective. Higher Educ Soc Sci. 2011;1(1):66-71.
Camargo CB, Jacobs E. Social Accountability and its Conceptual Challenges: An analytical framework [working paper]. Basel Institute on Governance; 2013.
Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann. 1969;35(4): 216-24. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225.
ANSA-EAP. What is social accountability?; 2008. Available: http://www.ansa-eap.net/about-us/who-we-are/
Malena C, Forster R, Singh J. Social accountability an introduction to the concept and emerging practice [working paper]. Social Development Department of the World Bank; 2004.
Joshi A, Houtzager PP. Widgets or Watchdogs?: Conceptual explorations in social accountability. Public Manag Rev. 2012;14(2):145-62. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.657837.
Sarkar SK, Dutta A. Democratic accountability in local governance institutions. PRIA Global Partnership; 2011.
Ahmad R. Governance, social accountability and the civil society. Gov Soc Acc Civ Soc JOAAG. 2008;3(1).
Chowdhury S. Public forums for social accountability: A study of Ward Shava and open budget system of 06 (six) union Parishads of Bangladesh. Asian J Dev Gov (AJDG). 2016;2(2):20-46.
Rahman K, Jenkins M. Social accountability initiatives and civil society contribution to anti-corruption efforts in Bangladesh. Brief. 2018;U4.
Kabeer N, Kabir AH. Citizenship narratives in the absence of good governance: voices of the working poor in Bangladesh. IDS Working Pap. 2009;331:01-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00331_2.x
Ahmed S. Local government in Bangladesh: a review of reform efforts from 1972 to 2006. Soc Change. 2007;1(4).
Sarker AE, Rahman MH. The role of social accountability in poverty alleviation programs in developing countries: An analysis with reference to Bangladesh. Public Organ Rev. 2015;15(2):317-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-014-0275-x
Talukdar MRI. Rural Local Government in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Osder Publications; 2009.
Monem M, Baniamin HM. Public service ethics and corruption in Bangladesh. In: Public administration in South Asian India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Routledge. 2013;237-56.
Hassan M. State of social accountability and deliberative democracy in Bangladesh (2018). Bangladesh: Brac Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), Brac University; 2019.
Ahmed T. Ward Sobha under union Parishads: challenges and prospects [researchreport]. Available:https://tofailahmed.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/ward-shobha-report_30-march-2016_final.pdf; 2016
Hossen MS, Obaidullah M. Citizens’ participation in rural local government in Bangladesh: through the Lens of Sherry Arnstein. Business Standard. Available:https://www.tbsnews.net/thoughts/citizens-participation-rural-local-government-bangladesh-through-lens-sherry-arnstein; 2022, December 17.
Ahmed T, Rashid HO, Ahmmed KN, Razzaque F. Social accountability mechanisms: A study on the union Parishads in Bangladesh. BRAC institute of governance and development (BIGD); 2016.
Ackerman JM. Social accountability in the public sector: A conceptual discussion. World Bank. 2005;35733.
-
Abstract View: 26 times
PDF Download: 25 times
