The Interplay of Historical Foundations, Resource Dynamics, and Ideological Frameworks in the Shaping of Tanzania's Foreign Policy Landscape: Practicability of the Dependency Theory

Adam Michael Mnyavanu

Department of Leadership, Ethics and Governance, Faculty of Leadership and Management Science, Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, P. O. Box -9193 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

David Haruna Mrisho *

Department of Public Relations and Advertising, St. Augustine University of Tanzania, P.O. Box-307, Mwanza, Tanzania.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

This article analyzes three key variables - ideology, history, and resources - to get a deeper insight into the intricate dynamics shaping Tanzania's foreign policy. The research examines how the country's diplomatic environment is influenced by resource considerations, historical legacies, and ideological shifts within the framework of dependence theory.

The findings from the survey show various perspectives on the influence of history, which is consistent with the emphasis of dependence theory on historical variables shaping foreign policy. The examination of resource contributions emphasizes the pressing necessity for policy reform, endorsing the suggestion of dependence theory for strategic resource utilization to reduce external constraints. Tanzania's strategic focus on developing economic partnerships outside of Western markets is evident in its ideological aspect. This is in line with the suggestion of dependency theory to reduce reliance on a certain set of trading partners in order to enhance the country's ability to navigate changing global economic trends.

Key Informant Interviews support the study's theoretical framework and demonstrate the ongoing influence of historical personalities such as Julius Nyerere on Tanzania's foreign policy. The study's findings resulted in three significant recommendations. To establish diplomatic partnerships that honour past legacies while adapting to current geopolitical circumstances, it is advisable to take a sophisticated approach to historical connections. Implementing thorough policy change is recommended to strategically protect and utilize national resources in global contexts. Finally, it is recommended to take a proactive approach to diverse economic relationships in alignment with the broader pan-African objective of reducing dependence on specific trade partners. valuable guidance for decision-makers navigating the complex process of developing foreign policy.

Keywords: Foreign policy, leadership, resource dynamics, dependency theory


How to Cite

Mnyavanu , A. M., & Mrisho , D. H. (2024). The Interplay of Historical Foundations, Resource Dynamics, and Ideological Frameworks in the Shaping of Tanzania’s Foreign Policy Landscape: Practicability of the Dependency Theory. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 21(5), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2024/v21i5811

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Müller P, Pomorska K, Tonra B. The domestic challenge to EU foreign policy-making: From europeanisation to de-europeanisation? Journal of European Integration. 2021;43(5):519–534 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1927015

Criekemans D. Foreign policy and diplomacy of the belgian regions: Flanders and Wallonia. Foreign policy of constituents units at the beginning of 21st century. 2010;43–102 Available:http://www.gencat.cat/drep/iea/pdfs/IEA_70.pdf

van der Ploeg F, Rohner D. War and natural resource exploitation. European Economic Review. 2012;56(8):1714–1729 Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.09.003

Peters M. The chinese dream: Xi jinping thought on socialism with chinese characteristics for a new era. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2017;49(14) : 1299–1304 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1407578

Dawson MC, Rosin C, Wald N. Global resource scarcity: Catalyst for conflict or cooperation? In Global Resource Scarcity: Catalyst for Conflict or Cooperation?; 2017 Available:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315281612

Ugarriza JE, Craig MJ. The relevance of ideology to contemporary armed conflicts: A quantitative analysis of former combatants in Colombia. In Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2013;57(3) Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712446131

Agbebi M, Virtanen P. Dependency theory–A conceptual lens to understand China’s presence in Africa? Forum for Development Studies. 2017a;44(3):429–451 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1281161

O’Connor B, Cooper D. Ideology and the foreign policy of Barack Obama: A liberal-realist approach to international affairs. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 2021;51(3): 635–666 Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12730

Clarke M, Ricketts A. Donald trump and american foreign policy: The return of the Jacksonian tradition. Comparative Strategy. 2017;36(4):366–379. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2017.1361210

Wiseman G. Contemporary challenges for foreign ministries: At home and abroad. Diplomacy and Statecraft. 2019;30(4):786–798 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2019.1673554

Adriani N. Electronic copy available at : Electronic copy available at : Grou. 2018; 23529(2):1–45.

Wojczewski T. Conspiracy theories, right-wing populism and foreign policy: the case of the Alternative for Germany. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2022;25(1):130–158 Available:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00218-y

Wenzelburger G, Böller F. Bomb or build? How party ideologies affect the balance of foreign aid and defence spending. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2020; 22(1):3–23 Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119883651

Pänke J. Liberal empire, geopolitics and EU strategy: Norms and interests in european foreign policy making. Geopolitics. 2019;24(1):100–123 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1528545

Agbebi M, Virtanen P. Dependency theory–A conceptual lens to understand China’s presence in Africa? Forum for Development Studies. 2017b;44(3):429–451 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1281161

Bu M. Hu Angang, China in 2020: A new type of superpower, China Perspectives. 2015(3):59–60 Available:https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6810

Gamso J, Moffett MH. Unraveling the belt and road initiative: China’s “building out” strategy. East Asia. 2023;40(1) Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-022-09394-1

Dhar BK, Mutalib M. Leadership of xi jinping behind unstoppable sustainable economic growth of China. International Journal of Organizational Leadership. 2020;9:39–47 Available:https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2020.60489

Neethling T. South Africa’s foreign policy and the BRICS formation: Reflections on the quest for the ‘right’ economic-diplomatic strategy. Insight on Africa. 2017; 9(1):39–61 Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087816674580

Agyiriwaa Asiedu C, Syed Murshed Lorenzo Pellegrini M. Natural resource dependence and economic growth in Ghana: The effect of oil Production (Issue December). International Insititute of Social Studies; 2017.

Mansoob Murshed S, Zulfan Tadjoeddin M. Revisiting the greed and grievance explanations for violent internal conflict. Journal of International Development. 2009;21(1):87–111.

Haruna AI, Abdul Salam A. Rethinking russian foreign policy towards Africa: Prospects and opportunities for cooperation in new geopolitical realities. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021;1(2) Available:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsocial.2021.1.2.24

Gonzalez-Vicente R. South–south relations under world market capitalism: The state and the elusive promise of national development in the China–Ecuador resource-development nexus. Review of International Political Economy. 2017;24 (5):881–903 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2017.1357646

Kabonga I. Dependency theory and donor aid: A critical analysis. Africanus: Journal of Development Studies. 2017;46(2):29–39 Available:https://doi.org/10.25159/0304-615x/1096

Prado FC. The ideology of development, the marxist theory of dependency, and the critique of the popular-democratic strategy. Latin American Perspectives. 2022;49 (1): 138–152 Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211043182

Zangirolami-raimundo J, Oliveira J De. Research methodology topics : Cross- sectional studies. 2018;28(3):356–360.

Meyer DK, Schutz PA. Why talk about qualitative and mixed methods in educational psychology? Introduction to special issue. Educational Psychologist. 2020;55(4):193–196 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1796671

Oduro S. Exploring the barriers to SMEs’ open innovation adoption in Ghana: A mixed research approach. International Journal of Innovation Science. 2020;12 (1):21–51 Available:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-11-2018-0119

Murphy AM. Great power rivalries, domestic politics and Southeast Asian foreign policy: Exploring the linkages. Asian Security. 2017;13(3):165–182 Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1354566

Abdel G. Non-aligned movement:Why in news. June. 2019;1–5.

Dimitrijević D. The non aligned movement and reform tendencies in the United Nations. The 60th anniversary of the non-aligned movement, February. 2021;429–462 Available:https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_60nam.2021.ch25

Magoma M. suleiman. The significant role of Tanzania’s diplomacy towards economic development by magoma , suleiman masegesa the significant role of tanzania’s diplomacy towards economic development by magoma , Suleiman Masegesa; 2019.

Balcilar M, Kutan AM, Yaya ME. Testing the dependency theory on small island economies: The case of Cyprus. Economic Modelling, 61(October 2016). 2017;1–11 Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.011